Maldanado v. Lane, Comptroller
F. Maldanado v. W.P. Lane, Comptroller.
Maldanado v. Lane, 167 S.W. 210 (Tex. 1914)
Headnotes
Mandamus—Question of Fact.
On the filing by respondent of an answer putting in issue facts relied on by relator for obtaining from the Supreme Court a writ of mandamus against the Comptroller, the application must be dismissed. (P. 350.)
Summary
Maldanado filed original petition in the' Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus against W. P. Lane as Comptroller, requiring issuance to relator of a license as retail liquor dealer.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice BROWH delivered the opinion of the court.
The respondent has under oath denied the material allegations of the applicant for mandamus, which makes issues of fact which this court can not try, therefore the application is dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.