Gillam v. State
Leonard Gillam v. the State
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
— The appeal is from a judgment assessing against the appellant a fine of one hundred dollars for unlawfully carrying a pistol.
The evidence shows that while the appellant was playing at a game a pistol dropped from his clothing. It was picked up by the *465 State’s witness. Appellant testified that the pistol was not in a condition to be used as a firearm in that the cylinder would not revolve; that he had taken it to have it repaired but was unable to get it repaired. He was corroborated in some degree by the testimony of his father that there were two pistols at his home, both of which were broken. The pistol in question came into the possession of the State’s witness, but neither by him nor by anyone else was the testimony of the appellant controverted. The pistol being in the condition described, appellant, under the facts, was not shown to be guilty of any offense. See Cook v. State, 11 Texas Crim. App., 19; Dillingham v. State, 32 S. W. Rep., 771 ; White v. State, 66 S. W. Rep., 773 ; Branch Ann. Texas P. C., Secs. 972-973.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed, and remanded.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.