Taylor v. Taylor
TAYLOR v. TAYLOR Et Al.
Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, J.
E. G. Taylor filed suit against E. L. Taylor, and citation was issued commanding him “to be and appear before the honorable district court of El Paso county, Tex., thirty-fourth judicial district, at the next regular term thereof, to be holden at the courthouse in the city of El Paso, on the 2d Monday in September, A. D. 1912, same being the 2d day of September, A. D. 1912.” The term of said court convened on September 2, 1912, and upon appearance day an interlocutory judgment by default was rendered against appellant, which was thereafter made final. A motion for new trial was filed, in which the sufficiency of the citation and the sheriff’s return thereon were attacked, which motion was overruled, and the cause is now before this ,court for review. There is a total want of certainty as to time in the citation. It is impossible for the second Monday in a month to be the second day thereof. Defendant therefore could not determine from the citation the correct date upon which he was to appear. This want of proper certainty cannot be supplied by construction or intendment, and the citation was defective. Wright v. Wilmot, 22 Tex. 398 ; McNeil v. Ballinger, 1 White & W. Oiv. Oas. Ct. App. § 841.
Reversed and remanded.
HARPER, C. J., did not sit in this case.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.