Craver v. Greer
CRAVER Et Al. v. GREER Et Al.
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
LEVY, J.
The controlling points in the case were certified to the Supreme Court, and they have decided, very correctly, as we think, that the respective liens of the appellants, except the National Bank of Daingerfield, should not have been subordinated to the indebtedness of the receivers. Craver v. Greer et al., 179 S. W. 862 . The statement of the ease and the facts as they appear in the opinion of the Supreme Court are correct and are here adopted in whole. Wherefore the judgment of the trial court is reversed, except as to the National Bank of Daingerfield, and, in order that the proper judgment in accordance with the opinion may be entered, the cause is remanded with instructions to enter judgment as decided by the Supreme Court. One-fourth of the costs of appeal will be taxed against the appellant the National Bank of Daingerfield, and three-fourths thereof taxed against the receivers.
Affirmed in part, and reversed and remanded in part, with instructions.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.