Womack v. Stokes
A. J. Womack v. J. K. P. Stokes Et Al.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Chief Justice.
— The appellees, Thomas H. Bayne, T. J. Routen, and R. F. Stokes, have moved to dismiss the appeal in this case, because the transcript was prepared and certified to by J. K. P. Stokes, who was the clerk of the District Court of Trinity County, from whose judgment the appeal is taken, and is also one of the appellees. This motion is supported by an affidavit as to the truth of the facts stated in the motion. An inspection of the transcript shows that the judgment of the court below was rendered in favor of said Stokes and the other appellees, and that the appeal bond is made payable to him and them.
The interest of the appellee J. K. P. Stokes is not identical with the interests of the other appellees, but the judgment operates in favor of all. He is clearly a party to the appeal.
The statute provides, that “in all cases wherein any district or county clerk in this State is, or shall hereafter be, a party to any pending or proposed suit, motion, or proceeding in their respective courts, the district or county judge in whose court the same may be pending or proposed shall, either in term time or in vacation, on application of any party interested, or of his own motion, appoint a clerk pro tern for the purpose of such suit, motion, or proceeding.” Also, that “the person so appointed shall perform all the duties required by law of the clerk in the particular suit, motion, or proceeding in which he may be appointed.” 1 Sayles Ann. Stats., art. 1116b. This statute renders the district or county clerk disqualified to act in a cause to which he may be a party. Lewis v. Hutchinson, 4 Will., 79 . Being disqualified to act, the clerk could not properly certify the transcript of the record which has been filed here. Hor could he file and approve the appeal bond. If the disqualification related only to the certificate, .the order would be to strike the case from the docket, but as it ex *593 tended also to the authority of the clerk to approve and file the appeal bond, the appeal will be dismissed.
Dismissed.
Delivered February 28, 1895.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.