TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Eugene M. Lonsdale, Sr. v. L.L. Smelser, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Co. And Unknown Others

Eugene M. LONSDALE, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L.L. SMELSER, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Co. and Unknown Others, Defendants-Appellees

Lonsdale v. L.L. Smelser, 709 F.2d 910 (5th Cir. 1983)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 30, 1983
Docket
No. 83-1004
Judges
Rubin, Johnson, Williams
Citations
709 F.2d 91056 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 61701983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26195

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

IT IS ORDERED that appellees’ Motion for Award of Double Costs and Attorneys’ Fees is granted.

In this Court’s order dismissing the appeal in this case, this Court noted that this *911 was appellant’s third appearance in federal court attacking well settled principles of this Nation’s income tax laws. Notably, in resolving an appeal brought by appellant in one of these earlier actions, this Court said:

Appellants’ contentions are stale ones, long settled against them. As such they are frivolous. Bending over backwards, in indulgence of appellants’

pro se status, we today forbear the sanctions of Rule 38, Fed.R.App.P. We publish this opinion as notice to future litigants that the continued advancing of these long-defunct arguments invites such sanctions, however.

Lonsdale v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 661 F.2d 71, 72 (5th Cir.1981).

Surprisingly, appellant ignored this Court’s admonition and brought the instant action relying on many of the same arguments rejected in Lonsdale v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 661 F.2d 71 (5th Cir.1981). Accordingly, this Court grants ap-pellees’ motion for award of double costs and attorneys’ fees. The motion being supported by an affidavit reflecting the time spent by counsel and the reasonable fee for such services, and these appearing to be reasonable and consonant with what is required in similar matters, we fix the attorneys’ fees at the sum of $1445.55.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1984: 21985: 21986: 11990: 219842026peak 1984 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lonsdale v. United States919 F.2d 1440 (10th Cir. 1990)
  2. No. 90-2113919 F.2d 1440 (10th Cir. 1990)
  3. John M. Hagerty v. Succession of Laura McCloskey Clement749 F.2d 217 (5th Cir. 1984)
  4. Pascoe v. Internal Revenue Service580 F. Supp. 649 (E.D. Mich. 1984)
  5. Charles T. Selser v. Pacific Motor Trucking Co., and Southern Pacific Transportation Company770 F.2d 551 (5th Cir. 1985)
  6. Wise v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service624 F. Supp. 1124 (D. Mont. 1986)

Most recent

  1. No. 90-2113919 F.2d 1440 (10th Cir. 1990)
  2. Lonsdale v. United States919 F.2d 1440 (10th Cir. 1990)
  3. Wise v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service624 F. Supp. 1124 (D. Mont. 1986)
  4. Charles T. Selser v. Pacific Motor Trucking Co., and Southern Pacific Transportation Company770 F.2d 551 (5th Cir. 1985)
  5. McCullough v. Secretary of Treasury621 F. Supp. 750 (N.D. Miss. 1985)
  6. John M. Hagerty v. Succession of Laura McCloskey Clement749 F.2d 217 (5th Cir. 1984)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Lonsdale v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 661 F.2d 71 (5th Cir. 1981) 118

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list