TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sloan v. State

R. M. Sloan v. the State

Sloan v. State, 44 S.W. 1095 (Tex. Crim. App. 1898)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 16, 1898
Docket
No. 1535.
Judges
Davidson
Citations
44 S.W. 109539 Tex. Crim. 631898 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 62
Headnotes
Appearance Bail Bond—Impossible Date. A bail bond executed on the 22d day of February, 1897, which required the principal to appear before the District Court on April 12, 187, states an impossible date and term" of court, and is a nullity.
Summary
Ho statement necessary.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Davidson

*64 DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment final on a forfeited bail bond. The bond was executed on February 22, 1897, by Ross Sloan, as principal, with four sureties, requiring said Sloan to appear before the District Court of Hardeman County to be held April 12, 187. The point was made below that it required the presence of said Ross Sloan at an impossible date and term of the court. This was overruled by the trial court, and judgment final was rendered. This ruling was made a ground of the motion for a new trial, and is assigned as error here. The point is well taken, and the State confesses error. Under the unbroken line of decisions in this State, the judgment must be reversed. See Mackey v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 24, and authorities there cited. The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Reversed and ordered dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1913: 11914: 11927: 11984: 119132026peak 1913 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lopez v. State678 S.W.2d 197 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1984)
  2. France v. Superior Court of California255 P. 815 (Cal. 1927)
  3. General Bonding & Casualty Ins. v. State165 S.W. 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 1913) · Dissent
  4. Ex Parte Barnett167 S.W. 845 (Tex. Crim. App. 1914)

Most recent

  1. Lopez v. State678 S.W.2d 197 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1984)
  2. France v. Superior Court of California255 P. 815 (Cal. 1927)
  3. Ex Parte Barnett167 S.W. 845 (Tex. Crim. App. 1914)
  4. General Bonding & Casualty Ins. v. State165 S.W. 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 1913) · Dissent

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
MacKey v. State, 40 S.W. 982 (Tex. Crim. App. 1897) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list