TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

The Northern Cheyenne Tribe of Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation v. Thomas Ralph Adsit

The Northern Cheyenne Tribe of Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation v. Adsit, 713 F.2d 502 (9th Cir. 1983)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 17, 1983
Docket
No. 80-3063
Citations
713 F.2d 5021983 U.S. App. LEXIS 24798

Opinion

713 F.2d 502

The NORTHERN CHEYENNE TRIBE OF NORTHERN CHEYENNE INDIAN RESERVATION, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Thomas Ralph ADSIT, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 79-4887, 80-3028, 80-3032, 80-3038, 80-3040, 80-3041, 80-3042, 80-3044, 80-3045, 80-3061, 80-3062 and 80-3063.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted July 15, 1983. Decided Aug. 17, 1983.

Thomas Pacheco, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for U.S.

Jeanne S. Whiteing, John E. Echohawk, Boulder, Colo., Calvin Wilson, Busby, Mont., for Cheyenne Tribe.

R. Anthony Rogers, John Michael Facciola, Glenn P. Sugameli, Wilkinson, Cragun & Barker, Washington, D.C., Thomas J. Lynaugh, Lynaugh, Fitzgerald, Schoppert & Skaggs, Billings, Mont., for Crow Tribe and The Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes.

Reid Peyton Chambers, Sonosky, Chambers & Sachse, Washington, D.C., for Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes, intervenors.

Steven L. Bunch, Montana Legal Services Ass'n, Helena, Mont., for Bowen.

Helena S. Maclay, Deirdre Boggs, Bruce McEvoy, Missoula, Mont., Bert W. Kronmiller, James E. Seykora, Douglas Y. Freeman, Hardin, Mont., for State of Mont.

Cale Crowley, Crowley, Haughey, Hanson, Gallagher & Toole, Maurice R. Colberg, Jr., Hibbs, Sweeney, Colberg, Jensen & Koessler, Billings, Mont., for numerous defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana; James F. Battin and Paul G. Hatfield, District Judges, Presiding.

Before MERRILL, CHOY and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

In Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Adsit, 668 F.2d 1080 (9th Cir.1982), we reversed the judgment of the district court.

2

The Supreme Court in turn reversed our determination sub nom. Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe of Arizona, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 3201 , 76 L.Ed.2d ---- (1983).

3

The judgment of the district court, 484 F.Supp. 31 , is AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe of Ariz., 463 U.S. 545 (1983) 185
The Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation v. Adsit, 668 F.2d 1080 (9th Cir. 1982) 19
Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation v. Tongue River Water Users Ass'n, 484 F. Supp. 31 (D. Mont. 1979) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list