TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Dominic Principato

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dominic PRINCIPATO, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Principato, 717 F.2d 1313 (9th Cir. 1983)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 6, 1983
Docket
No. 83-5103
Judges
Schroeder, Canby, Hoffman
Citations
717 F.2d 13131983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16247

Opinion — Schroeder

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge.

The district court in 1980 imposed upon appellant a “split” sentence of two years imprisonment (18 months suspended) plus five years probation. That sentence was appropriate under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3651 .

1

Two years later the same district court, upon a petition for revocation of probation, imposed a second “split” sentence of 18 months (12 months suspended) plus three and one-half years probation. This sentence, as the government acknowledges, was not appropriate because section 3651 prohibits a defendant who has already served six months in prison from receiving a second sentence combining both imprisonment and probation.

United States v. Clayton, 588 F.2d 1288, 1292 (9th Cir.1979). Defendant now appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to correct the illegal sentence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a).

While we agree with defendant that his second sentence was illegal and must be corrected, we do not agree with his argument that the only possible remedy is to terminate his remaining probation term. In Clayton , we held that a court may always correct an illegal sentence by imposing all or part of the sentence which might originally have been imposed. 588 F.2d at 1291 .

See Nicholas v. United States, 527 F.2d 1160 (9th Cir.1976);

United States v. Kenyon, 519 F.2d 1229 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 935 , 96 S.Ct. 293 , 46 L.Ed.2d 267 (1975); 18 U.S.C. § 3653 . We must therefore remand for resentencing and allow the district court to impose either imprisonment or probation in place of the second “split” sentence. In either case, full credit must be given for the time defendant has already served.

Clayton, 588 F.2d at 1292 .

Vacated and remanded.

1

. 18 U.S.C. § 3651 provides in pertinent part:

Upon entering a judgment of conviction of any offense not punishable by death or life imprisonment, if the maximum punishment provided for such offense is more than six months, any court having jurisdiction to try offenses against the United States, when satisfied that the ends of justice and the best interest of the public as well as the defendant will be served thereby, may impose a sentence in excess of six months and provide that the defendant be confined in a jail-type institution or a treatment institution for a period not exceeding six months and that the execution of the remainder of the sentence be suspended and the defendant placed on probation for such period and upon such terms and conditions as the court deems best.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1986: 11991: 11992: 11993: 11994: 12017: 119862026peak 1986 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Boris Olarte-Morales992 F.2d 1223 (10th Cir. 1993)
  2. United States v. Alvin Gerson Levitt799 F.2d 505 (9th Cir. 1986)
  3. Wlodarczyk v. State836 P.2d 279 (Wyo. 1992)
  4. United States v. David John Martin, Jr.938 F.2d 883 (8th Cir. 1991)
  5. Miller v. People67 V.I. 827 (2017)
  6. United States v. Mark A. Barquera26 F.3d 133 (9th Cir. 1994)

Most recent

  1. Miller v. People67 V.I. 827 (2017)
  2. United States v. Mark A. Barquera26 F.3d 133 (9th Cir. 1994)
  3. United States v. Boris Olarte-Morales992 F.2d 1223 (10th Cir. 1993)
  4. Wlodarczyk v. State836 P.2d 279 (Wyo. 1992)
  5. United States v. David John Martin, Jr.938 F.2d 883 (8th Cir. 1991)
  6. United States v. Alvin Gerson Levitt799 F.2d 505 (9th Cir. 1986)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Clayton, 588 F.2d 1288 (9th Cir. 1979) 59
Nicholas v. United States, 527 F.2d 1160 (9th Cir. 1976) 35
Byrd v. Guilford Cnty. Superior Court, 423 U.S. 936 (1975) 25
United States v. Kenyon, 519 F.2d 1229 (9th Cir. 1975) 23

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list