Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation v. Instromedix, Inc., an Oregon Corporation
Opinion
718 F.2d 971
PACEMAKER DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC OF AMERICA, INC., a Tennessee Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. INSTROMEDIX, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.
Nos. 82-3152, 82-3182.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 20, 1983.
J. Pierre Kolisch, Kolisch, Hartwell, Dickinson & Stuart, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellee, cross-appellant.
Sherman O. Parrett, Cushman, Darby & Cushman, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant, cross-appellee.
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.ORDER 1
Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment, 712 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir.1983) is withdrawn.
2
Oral argument in the above case will be held in San Francisco, on Tuesday, November 15, 1983, at 1:30 p.m.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.