TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Irvin H. Hilliard v. United States Postal Service

Hilliard v. United States Postal Serv., 722 F.2d 1555 (Fed. Cir. 1983)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 6, 1983
Docket
No. 83-923
Citations
722 F.2d 15551983 U.S. App. LEXIS 13705

Opinion

722 F.2d 1555

Irvin H. HILLIARD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondents.

Appeal No. 83-923.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 6, 1983.

Appeal from Merit Systems Protection Board.

Alan Bryant Chambers, Memphis, Tenn., submitted for petitioner.

J. Paul McGrath, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Robert A. Reutershan, Stephen C. Alpern and Joan C. Goodrich, Washington, D.C., submitted for respondents.

Before BALDWIN, BENNETT and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

1

The decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board affirming petitioner's removal arises from a "mixed" case and is, therefore, not within this court's jurisdiction to review. Williams v. Department of the Army, 715 F.2d 1485 (Fed.Cir.1983).

2

Because the pleadings before the district court allege discrimination and do not track the issues of this appeal, it is in the interest of justice that we transfer this case to the district court under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1631 .

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

3

The case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Western Division.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1984: 11986: 119842026peak 1984 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Atari, Inc. v. Js & a Group, Inc.747 F.2d 1422 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  2. Thomas W. HILL v. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE796 F.2d 1469 (Fed. Cir. 1986)

Most recent

  1. Thomas W. HILL v. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE796 F.2d 1469 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
  2. Atari, Inc. v. Js & a Group, Inc.747 F.2d 1422 (Fed. Cir. 1984)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Williams v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, 715 F.2d 1485 (Fed. Cir. 1983) 174

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list