Borders v. Reagan
William A. Borders, Jr., Commissioner, District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission v. Ronald Reagan, President, United States of America, Government of the District of Columbia and District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission
Opinion
732 F.2d 181 235 U.S.App.D.C. 295
William A. BORDERS, Jr., Commissioner, District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission, v. Ronald REAGAN, President, United States of America, et al., Appellants, Government of the District of Columbia and District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission.
No. 81-1998.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
April 27, 1982. Ordered Published March 27, 1984.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 81-01312.
Robert E. Kopp, Alfred R. Mollin and William Kanter, Attys., U.S. Dept. of Justice, and Charles F.C. Ruff, U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for appellants.
Frederick B. Abramson, Washington, D.C., for appellee District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Com'n.
Dudley R. Williams and Herbert O. Reid, Sr., Washington, D.C., for appellee William A. Borders, Jr.
Judith W. Rogers, Corp. Counsel, Charles L. Reischel, Lutz Alexander Prager and Michael E. Zielinski, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for appellee District of Columbia.
Before MacKINNON, ROBB and WALD, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
1
On consideration of the motion of the federal appellants to vacate and remand, it is 2
ORDERED by the Court that the aforesaid motion is granted and the order of the District Court, 518 F.Supp. 250 , of July 7, 1981 is vacated and, it is 3
FURTHER ORDERED by the Court that this case is remanded to the District Court with direction to dismiss the complaint as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 39 , 71 S.Ct. 104, 106 , 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.