TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United Farm Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations Board

UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARIZONA AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

United Farm Workers of Am., Afl-Cio v. Ariz. Agric. Emp. Relations Bd., 733 F.2d 78 (9th Cir. 1984)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 8, 1984
Docket
No. 80-5777
Judges
Ferguson, Nelson, Reinhardt
Citations
733 F.2d 781984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22706

Opinion

ORDER The court sitting en banc has affirmed the judgment of the district court that the Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations Act is facially constitutional, 727 F.2d 1475 .

The court did not determine whether the Act is constitutional as applied in any specific instance.

The case is remanded to the district court with directions to permit the plaintiffs to amend their complaint to raise any issues not determined by the March 14, 1984 decision of the court sitting en banc.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED for further proceedings.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United Farm Workers of Am., Afl-Cio v. Ariz. Agric. Emp. Relations Bd., 727 F.2d 1475 (9th Cir. 1984) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list