TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

James Allen v. State of Alabama

James ALLEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, Respondent-Appellee

Allen v. Alabama, 735 F.2d 1276 (11th Cir. 1984)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 21, 1984
Docket
No. 82-7290
Judges
Godbold, Roney, Smith
Citations
735 F.2d 12761984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21286

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

Respondent’s motion to revise our order, 732 F.2d 858 , denying rehearing in this case is GRANTED. The language in the second paragraph, “[w]e held that petitioner was entitled to the out-of-time appeal and, because he is indigent, to a transcript of his trial as an incident thereto,” is deleted and the following is inserted in lieu thereof:

We held that petitioner was entitled to an evidentiary hearing to determine whether he had voluntarily and knowingly waived his right to appeal.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2000: 120002026peak 2000 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Allen v. Alabama, 732 F.2d 858 (11th Cir. 1984) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list