TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State of Wisconsin, and County of Marquette, Michigan, Intervening v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Individually and as Secretary of the Department of Defense

STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, and County of Marquette, Michigan, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Caspar W. WEINBERGER, Individually and as Secretary of the Department of Defense, Et Al., Defendants-Appellants

State of Wis., & Cnty. of Marquette, Mich., Intervening v. Weinberger, 736 F.2d 438 (7th Cir. 1984)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 13, 1984
Docket
No. 84-1569
Judges
Cummings, Wood, Cudahy
Citations
736 F.2d 4381984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21586

Opinion

ORDER The order of the district court, 582 F.Supp. 1489 , granting plaintiffs’ motion for a permanent injunction enjoining the Department of Defense from taking any further action with respect to the construction of a new ELF (extremely low frequency) submarine communications * facility in Marquette County, Michigan, from upgrading the existing ELF facility in the Chequanmegon National Forest in northern Wisconsin, and from furnishing ELF receivers to submarines until the defendants have prepared a supplemental environmental impact statement in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act is hereby reversed and the injunction is vacated.

This case has been briefed, argued, and considered by this Court on an expedited basis. We have decided to enter this order immediately because we do not perceive any reason or justification for further delaying the implementation of this national defense project authorized by Congress and directed by the President. However, an opinion of the panel majority, together with a separate opinion by Judge Cudahy concurring in part and dissenting in part, will follow in due course, addressing the permanent injunction and disposing of all other relevant issues. All members of the panel are presently in agreement that the permanent injunction should be vacated at this time.

* With the ELF communications system, a submarine is able to receive messages while maintaining operational speeds at depths at which it is practically immune from detection.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1984: 12020: 119842026peak 1984 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Wisconsin v. Weinberger, 582 F. Supp. 1489 (W.D. Wis. 1984) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list