TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

The University of Tennessee v. United States Department of Health and Human Services Health Care Financing Administration

The UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; Health Care Financing Administration, Defendants-Appellees

The Univ. of Tenn. v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs. Health Care Fin. Admin., 737 F.2d 579 (6th Cir. 1984)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 2, 1984
Docket
No. 83-5390
Judges
Edwards, Contie, Well-Ford
Citations
737 F.2d 57918 Educ. L. Rep. 5431984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20877

Opinion — Per Curiam

*580 PER CURIAM.

This is a dispute between the University of Tennessee which operates a hospital as a part of its medical teaching service and the United States Health and Human Services Department which, through Medicare, reimburses hospitals like that at the University of Tennessee for certain hospital costs. The computation of those costs involves the designing of a formula for finding the daily costs of caring for a hospitalized patient in each hospital. When using this formula, the Secretary has required, hospitals to include women in the labor rooms as patients for purposes of the daily census. The hospital argues that although labor room patients are counted in the census, not all costs generated by these patients are taken into account in computing the total costs for all patients. This practice, the hospital argues, results in underpayment of medicare reimbursement.

This case was heard before Judge Robert Taylor in the Eastern District of Tennessee, 573 F.Supp. 795 , who found that it was reasonable to include pregnant mothers in the calculus. We will not reach the merits of this complex issue since, in the midst of the oral argument, the Secretary’s representative agreed with the lawyer for the hospital that it would be desirable to resubmit this issue to the Secretary for further consideration probably particularly in the light of St. Mary of Nazareth Hospital Center, et al. v. Schweiker, 718 F.2d 459 (D.C.Cir.1983), wherein Judge McGowan wrote in favor of St. Mary’s on the identical issue presented here.

This court now adopts the remand suggestion as advanced by the parties and refers this case back to Judge Taylor for remand by him to the Health and Human Services Department for further consideration referred to above.

We also deal with the second issue in this case by reaffirming a decision already twice decided by this court in Harper-Grace Hospitals v. Schweiker, 691 F.2d 808 (6th Cir.1982), reh’g denied, 708 F.2d 199 (6th Cir.1983).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1984: 11985: 71986: 219842026peak 1985 · 7

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. 10 soc.sec.rep.ser. 413, Medicare&medicaid Gu 34,872 Community Hospital of Roanoke Valley Giles Memorial Hospital Johnston Memorial Hospital King's Daughters' Hospital Lonesome Pine Hospital Martha Jefferson Hospital Memorial Hospital Roanoke Memorial Hospital Smyth County Community Hospital Twin County Community Hospital Waynesboro Community Hospital and Wythe County Community Hospital v. Health and Human Services, Culpeper Memorial Hospital, Inc. Depaul Hospital Fairfax Hospital Loudoun Memorial Hospital Mary Washington Hospital, Inc. Medical College of Virginia Petersburg General Hospital Portsmouth General Hospital St770 F.2d 1257 (4th Cir. 1985)
  2. Community Hospital v. Health & Human Services770 F.2d 1257 (4th Cir. 1985)
  3. St. Mary of Nazareth Hospital Center v. Heckler760 F.2d 1311 (D.C. Cir. 1985)
  4. University of Michigan Hospitals v. Heckler609 F. Supp. 756 (E.D. Mich. 1985)
  5. Central DuPage Hospital v. Heckler761 F.2d 354 (7th Cir. 1985)
  6. Culpeper Memorial Hospital v. Heckler592 F. Supp. 1173 (E.D. Va. 1984)

Most recent

  1. McKeesport Hospital v. Heckler643 F. Supp. 275 (W.D. Pa. 1986)
  2. Sioux Valley Hospital v. Bowen792 F.2d 715 (8th Cir. 1986)
  3. 10 soc.sec.rep.ser. 413, Medicare&medicaid Gu 34,872 Community Hospital of Roanoke Valley Giles Memorial Hospital Johnston Memorial Hospital King's Daughters' Hospital Lonesome Pine Hospital Martha Jefferson Hospital Memorial Hospital Roanoke Memorial Hospital Smyth County Community Hospital Twin County Community Hospital Waynesboro Community Hospital and Wythe County Community Hospital v. Health and Human Services, Culpeper Memorial Hospital, Inc. Depaul Hospital Fairfax Hospital Loudoun Memorial Hospital Mary Washington Hospital, Inc. Medical College of Virginia Petersburg General Hospital Portsmouth General Hospital St770 F.2d 1257 (4th Cir. 1985)
  4. Community Hospital v. Health & Human Services770 F.2d 1257 (4th Cir. 1985)
  5. St. Mary of Nazareth Hospital Center v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health & Human Services, Mount Zion Hospital and Medical Center v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health & Human Services, Washington Township Hospital District, D/B/A Washington Hospital v. Margaret M760 F.2d 1311 (D.C. Cir. 1985)
  6. University of Michigan Hospitals v. Heckler609 F. Supp. 756 (E.D. Mich. 1985)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Harper-Grace Hospitals, a Mich. Corp. v. Schweiker, 691 F.2d 808 (6th Cir. 1982) 19
Harper-Grace Hospitals, a Mich. Corp. v. Schweiker, 708 F.2d 199 (6th Cir. 1983) 9
Univ. of Tenn. v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 573 F. Supp. 795 (E.D. Tenn. 1983) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list