Stenson v. Blum
Stenson v. Blum, 738 F.2d 418 (2d Cir. 1984)
Opinion
738 F.2d 418
Stenson v. Blum
81-7385
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
5/25/84 1
S.D.N.Y.
REMANDED
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Mammano v. Pittston Co.
- 52 Fair empl.prac.cas. 794, 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,294 Darla Mammano, Patsy Hatfield, Judy McKinney Nancy Bolen, Patricia Runion, Robin Keener, and Rose Sansom v. The Pittston Company, a Corporation, Darla Mammano, Patsy Hatfield, Judy McKinney Nancy Bolen, Patricia Runion, Robin Keener, and Rose Sansom v. The Pittston Company, a Corporation
Most recent
- 52 Fair empl.prac.cas. 794, 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,294 Darla Mammano, Patsy Hatfield, Judy McKinney Nancy Bolen, Patricia Runion, Robin Keener, and Rose Sansom v. The Pittston Company, a Corporation, Darla Mammano, Patsy Hatfield, Judy McKinney Nancy Bolen, Patricia Runion, Robin Keener, and Rose Sansom v. The Pittston Company, a Corporation
- Mammano v. Pittston Co.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.