TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Nikki Burks

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nikki BURKS, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Burks, 210 F. App'x 965 (11th Cir. 2006)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 15, 2006
Docket
No. 06-12810
Judges
Black, Marcus, Cox
Citations
210 F. App'x 965
Status
Unpublished
Summary
Non-Argument Calendar.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Michelle L. Hendrix, appointed counsel for Nikki Burks, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit; therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Burks’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) 83,798

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list