TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Carl Ray Songer v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc., and Richard L. Dugger, Etc.

Carl Ray SONGER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Etc., and Richard L. Dugger, Etc., Respondents-Appellees

Songer v. Wainwright, 758 F.2d 552 (11th Cir. 1985)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 9, 1985
Docket
No. 83-3500
Judges
Godbold, Roney, Tjoflat, Hill, Fay, Vance, Kravitch, Johnson, Henderson, Anderson, Clark
Citations
758 F.2d 5521985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29383
Summary
ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

By order entered March 20, 1985, 756 F.2d 1482 , the court has ordered that No. 85-3064 {Songer II)

be heard by the court en banc, with oral argument.

In 83-3500 {Songer I), a judge in regular active service has moved that the court en *553 banc rehear the merits of the case, with oral argument, along with the en banc hearing on Songer II.

A majority of the judges in regular active service have voted in favor of the motion.

It is ORDERED that 83-3500 {Songer I)

shall be reheard by this court sitting en banc with oral argument, along with the hearing en banc in Songer II. The cases are consolidated for this purpose. The clerk will specify, and coordinate, briefing schedules for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion filed on May 18, 1984, and the order of the panel entered January 29, 1985 are VACATED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1986: 11993: 119862026peak 1986 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Presley v. City of Benbrook4 F.3d 405 (5th Cir. 1993)
  2. Richmond v. Ricketts640 F. Supp. 767 (D. Ariz. 1986)

Most recent

  1. Presley v. City of Benbrook4 F.3d 405 (5th Cir. 1993)
  2. Richmond v. Ricketts640 F. Supp. 767 (D. Ariz. 1986)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list