TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Strachan Shipping Company v. Nash

Strachan Shipping Company and Texas Employers' Insurance Association v. Earl F. Nash and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Dept. Of Labor

Strachan Shipping Co. v. Nash, 760 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1985)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 1, 1985
Docket
No. 83-4332
Citations
760 F.2d 5691985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29962

Opinion

760 F.2d 569

STRACHAN SHIPPING COMPANY and Texas Employers' Insurance Association, Petitioners, v. Earl F. NASH and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Dept. of Labor, Respondents.

No. 83-4332.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 1, 1985.

Steven L. Roberts, Houston, Tex., for petitioners.

T. Timothy Ryan, Jr., Sol. of Labor, Joshua T. Gillilan, II, Marianne Demetral Smith, Dept. of Labor, for respondents.

1

Stephen M. Vaughan, Houston, Tex., for Earl F. Nash.

2

Agnes G. Kurtz, Benefits Review Bd., U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for other interested parties.

3

Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC 4

(Opinion February 4, 1985, 5 Cir., 1985, 751 F.2d 1460 )

5

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and HILL, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

6

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, 7

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list