TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America

SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE, Et Al. v. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and the United States of America

San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n & the United States, 760 F.2d 1320 (D.C. Cir. 1985)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 1, 1985
Docket
No. 84-1410
Judges
Robinson, Wright, Tamm, Wald, Mikva, Edwards, Ginsburg, Bork, Scalia, Starr
Citations
760 F.2d 1320245 U.S. App. D.C. 2961985 U.S. App. LEXIS 31610
Cited by 30 Original from court

Opinion — Per Curiam

ORDER PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of petitioners’ motion for leave to file exhibits in support of the *1321 suggestion for rehearing en banc, the responses thereto, and of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the motion for leave to file exhibits is granted, and it is FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that petitioners’ suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted in part, and it is FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that only Section III.B of the Court’s opinion, 751 F.2d 1287 and the corresponding part of the judgment of the Court, issued on December 31, 1984, are hereby vacated, and it is FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the full power operating license remains in effect and is not stayed pending the rehearing en banc.

BORK, Circuit Judge would deny the motion for leave to file exhibits in support of the suggestion and would deny the suggestion.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 30 cases

View all citing references →
1985: 11986: 51987: 21989: 21990: 11991: 11992: 11993: 21997: 11998: 11999: 12008: 12009: 12011: 12013: 22014: 22018: 42021: 119852026peak 1986 · 5

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Cuomo v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission772 F.2d 972 (D.C. Cir. 1985)
  2. San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Pacific Gas and Electric Company . (Three Cases). San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Scenic Shoreline Preservation Conference, Inc. Ecology Action Club Sandra Silver Gordon Silver Elizabeth Apfelberg and John J789 F.2d 26 (D.C. Cir. 1986)
  3. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit869 F.2d 719 (3d Cir. 1989)
  4. Limerick Ecology Action, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission869 F.2d 719 (3d Cir. 1989)
  5. Kent County, Delaware Levy Court v. United States Environmental Protection Agency963 F.2d 391 (D.C. Cir. 1992)
  6. Ammex, Inc. v. United States62 F. Supp. 2d 1148 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1999)

Most recent

  1. Yellowstone to Uintas Connection v. BollingNo. 4:20-cv-00192 (D. Idaho Dec. 1, 2021)
  2. Food & Water Watch v. United States Department of AgricultureNo. 2017-1714 (D.D.C. Sept. 7, 2018)
  3. Food & Water Watch v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.325 F. Supp. 3d 39 (D.C. Cir. 2018)
  4. Unitedhealthcare Insurance Company v. BurwellNo. 2016-0157 (D.D.C. Aug. 1, 2018)
  5. UnitedHealthCare Ins. Co. v. Azar316 F. Supp. 3d 339 (D.C. Cir. 2018)
  6. Stand Up for California! v. United States Department of Interior71 F. Supp. 3d 109 (D.D.C. 2014)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list