TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cook v. The Deltona Corporation

Wendell Cook, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. The Deltona Corporation, Marco Island Development Corporation, and MacKle Brothers Division, a Corporation, Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees

Cook v. The Deltona Corp., 763 F.2d 398 (11th Cir. 1985)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 12, 1985
Docket
No. 83-5651
Citations
763 F.2d 3981985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30628

Opinion

763 F.2d 398

Wendell COOK, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. The DELTONA CORPORATION, Marco Island Development Corporation, and Mackle Brothers Division, a Corporation, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

No. 83-5651.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 12, 1985.

Joseph Mancilla, Jr., Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellants/cross-appellees.

Robert F. Childs, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee/cross-appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion February 27, 1985, 11 Cir., 1985, 753 F.2d 1552 ).

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, HILL, Circuit Judge, and PECK * , Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

On petition for rehearing appellee/cross-appellant Wendell Cook notes that the panel failed to address his contention that the district court abused discretion in refusing to award Cook expert witness costs of $2,474.86. Addressing this issue, we find that the judgment of the district court denying expert witness costs was not abuse of discretion and affirm that judgment. See J. Moore, W. Taggart & J. Wicker, Moore's Federal Practice p 54.77 [5.-3] (2d ed. 1983).

2

Excepting only the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby 3

DENIED.

* Honorable John W. Peck, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1993: 119932026peak 1993 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. S.L.H. Investment Corp. v. K-Site 700 Associates613 So. 2d 546 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Most recent

  1. S.L.H. Investment Corp. v. K-Site 700 Associates613 So. 2d 546 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list