TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Audiovox Corporation v. The United States

AUDIOVOX CORPORATION, Appellant, v. the UNITED STATES, Appellee

Audiovox Corp. v. The United States, 764 F.2d 848 (Fed. Cir. 1985)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 14, 1985
Docket
No. 19-1846
Judges
Friedman, Rich, Bennett
Citations
764 F.2d 8481985 U.S. App. LEXIS 15007

Opinion — Bennett

BENNETT, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the United States Court of International Trade (DiCarlo, J.), dismissing for lack of jurisdiction the suit of Audiovox Corporation seeking review of the denial by the United States Customs Service of its protest against the reliquidation of entries of FM radio converters at 6 percent ad valorem under item 685.29 of the Tariff Schedule of the United States.

The protest requested that the entries be accorded treatment under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP), 19 U.S.C. §§ 2461-2465 (1982), and accordingly liquidated duty free under the same classification. The court found that an earlier protest against liquidation, which had succeeded in obtaining reliquidation at a reduction of the tariff rate, had nevertheless failed to request GSP duty-free treatment. Thus, such treatment had not been sought in a timely manner, and the protest against reli-quidation, in contravention of 19 U.S.C. § 1514 (d) (1982), raised a “question not involved in such reliquidation,” removing the suit from the subject-matter jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade delineated in 28 U.S.C. § 1581 (1982).

Upon our review of the submissions and arguments of the parties, we affirm the dismissal below on the basis of the opinion of Judge DiCarlo. 598 F.Supp. 387 (1984).

AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1985: 21986: 31988: 11989: 21990: 11992: 31994: 119852026peak 1986 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Computime, Inc. v. The United States772 F.2d 874 (Fed. Cir. 1985)
  2. Atari Caribe, Inc. v. United States799 F. Supp. 99 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1992)
  3. Dow Chemical Co. v. United States647 F. Supp. 1574 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1986)
  4. Dornier Medical Systems, Inc. v. United States747 F. Supp. 753 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1990)
  5. NEC Electronics U.S.A. Inc. v. United States709 F. Supp. 1171 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)
  6. San Francisco Newspaper Printing Co. v. United States620 F. Supp. 738 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1985)

Most recent

  1. Wolff Shoe Co. v. United States861 F. Supp. 133 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1994)
  2. Washington International Insurance v. United States16 Ct. Int'l Trade 599 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1992)
  3. Atari Caribe, Inc. v. United States799 F. Supp. 99 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1992)
  4. Tail Active Sportswear v. United States793 F. Supp. 325 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1992)
  5. Dornier Medical Systems, Inc. v. United States747 F. Supp. 753 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1990)
  6. Philip Morris U.S.A. v. United States716 F. Supp. 1479 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Audiovox Corp. v. United States, 598 F. Supp. 387 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1984) 15

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list