TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

William Lloyd Hill v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction

Hill v. A.L. Lockhart, Dir., Ark. Dep't of Corr., 764 F.2d 1279 (8th Cir. 1984)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Subsequent history: aff'd, Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 20, 1984
Docket
No. 83-1397
Citations
764 F.2d 12791984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18423

Opinion

764 F.2d 1279

William Lloyd HILL, Appellant, v. A.L. LOCKHART, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellee.

No. 83-1397.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 10, 1984. Decided Sept. 20, 1984.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas; Garnett Thomas Eisele, Chief Judge.

1

Before LAY, Chief Judge, FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge, and HEANEY, BRIGHT, ROSS, McMILLIAN, ARNOLD, JOHN R. GIBSON, FAGG and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges, en banc.

2

Prior Report: 731 F.2d 568 (8th Cir.1984).

ORDER 3

This case has been considered by the court en banc. The judgment of the district court is affirmed by an equally divided court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1989: 11993: 11996: 12007: 119892026peak 1989 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. William Lloyd Hill v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction877 F.2d 698 (8th Cir. 1989)
  2. Falby v. Commissioner of Correction629 A.2d 1154 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993)
  3. State v. Sharkey927 A.2d 519 (N.H. 2007)
  4. Baker v. Pataki85 F.3d 919 (2d Cir. 1996)

Most recent

  1. State v. Sharkey927 A.2d 519 (N.H. 2007)
  2. Baker v. Pataki85 F.3d 919 (2d Cir. 1996)
  3. Falby v. Commissioner of Correction629 A.2d 1154 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993)
  4. William Lloyd Hill v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction877 F.2d 698 (8th Cir. 1989)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Hill v. A.L. Lockhart, Dir., Ark. Dep't of Corr., 731 F.2d 568 (8th Cir. 1984) 49

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list