United States v. Billy G. Young
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Billy G. YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The Court, in its initial opinion in this matter, rejected each of Appellant’s contentions with the exception of his arguments relating to prosecutorial misconduct.
United States v. Young, 736 F.2d 565 (10th Cir.1984). Appellee’s Petition for a Writ of Certiorari was granted by the United States Supreme Court on February 21, 1984, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1271 , 79 L.Ed.2d 676 , and this Court’s ruling concerning Appellant’s prosecutorial misconduct contentions was then reversed. — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1038 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). The Court then withdrew its prior opinion in this matter.
United States v. Young, 758 F.2d 514 (10th Cir.1985).
The Court, upon reconsideration, believes that the balance of its initial opinion, affirming the remainder of the judgment of *738 the trial court below, should be reaffirmed, and therefore the judgment is AFFIRMED.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(finding harmless error where the prosecutor made an improper statement that the defendant was guilty and urged the jury to "do its job")
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.