TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Martinez-Sandoval

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guadalupe MARTINEZ-SANDOVAL, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Martinez-Sandoval, 199 F. App'x 394 (5th Cir. 2006)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 8, 2006
Docket
No. 05-41412
Judges
King, Garwood, Jolly
Citations
199 F. App'x 394
Status
Unpublished

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Guadalupe Martinez-Sandoval raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998) 11,006

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list