TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Conklin Wallace

UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee, v. Conklin WALLACE, Petitioner-Appellant

United States v. Wallace, 783 F.2d 951 (9th Cir. 1986)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 26, 1986
Docket
No. 85-5560
Judges
Browning, Goodwin, Wallace, Sneed, Kennedy, Anderson, Hug, Tang, Sko-Pil, Schroeder, Fletcher, Farris, Pregerson, Alarcon, Poole, Ferguson, Nelson, Canby, Booc-Hever, Norris, Reinhardt, Beezer, Hall, Wiggins, Brunetti, Kozinski, Noonan, Thompson
Citations
783 F.2d 951

Opinion

ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1986: 119862026peak 1986 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Park Hung Quan789 F.2d 711 (9th Cir. 1986)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Park Hung Quan789 F.2d 711 (9th Cir. 1986)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list