TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Curtis Michael Richendollar v. Diamond M Drilling Company, Inc. and Baker Shipyards, Inc.

Curtis Michael RICHENDOLLAR, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. DIAMOND M DRILLING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, and Baker Shipyards, Inc., Defendant-Appellee

Richendollar v. Diamond M Drilling Co., 790 F.2d 442 (5th Cir. 1986)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 28, 1986
Docket
No. 84-2492
Judges
Clark, Gee, Rubin, Reavley, Politz, Randall, Johnson, Williams, Garwood, Jolly, Higginbotham, Davis, Hill, Jones
Citations
790 F.2d 4421986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31038

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion March 5, 1986, 5 Cir., 1986, 784 F.2d 580 )

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Richendollar v. Diamond M Drilling Co., 784 F.2d 580 (5th Cir. 1986) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list