TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Theodore Tiedemann Corp. v. Commissioner

Appeal of THEODORE TIEDEMANN CORPORATION.

Theodore Tiedemann Corp. v. Comm'r, 1 B.T.A. 1080 (B.T.A. 1925)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals · Federal Specialty Courts
Decided
April 29, 1925
Docket
No. 1255.
Judges
Lansdon, Graupner, Smith
Citations
1 B.T.A. 10801925 BTA LEXIS 2675

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

DECISION.

The determination of the Commissoner is approved. Appeal of Theodore Tidemann, & Sons, Inc., 1 B. T. A. 1077.

Combined text as published — syllabus, headnotes and all opinions in one document

Appeal of THEODORE TIEDEMANN CORPORATION.

Theodore Tiedemann Corp. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 1255.

United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 1080 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2675 ; April 29, 1925 , decided Submitted April 2, 1925 .

*2675 J. R. Little, Esq., for the taxpayer.

A. H. Fast, Esq., for the Commissioner.

*1080 Before GRAUPNER, LANSDON, and SMITH.

This appeal is from deficiencies in income and profits taxes for the month of December, 1917, and the period January 1 to May 31, 1918, in the amounts of $859.68 and $758.57, respectively. The only question in issue is the disallowance of $1,321.01 of the depreciation claimed for the month of December, 1917, and $6,605.09 for the fiscal period January 1 to May 31, 1918. From the oral and documentary evidence introduced the Board makes the following

FINDINGS OF FACT.

The taxpayer has consistently computed the amount of depreciation chargeable against income by making an appraisal of its depreciable property at the end of each taxable period and by deducting that amount from the appraised value of the depreciable property at the beginning of the taxable period after making adjustments for additions and sales of such property. The Commissioner has rejected this method of computing depreciation and has computed depreciation on the straight-line method.

DECISION.

*2676 The determination of the Commissioner is approved. .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list