TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Austin v. Commissioner

Appeal of WILBERT J. AUSTIN.

Austin v. Comm'r, 1 B.T.A. 18 (B.T.A. 1924)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals · Federal Specialty Courts
Decided
October 18, 1924
Docket
No. 82.
Judges
Marqtxette, Ivins, Korneh
Citations
1 B.T.A. 181924 BTA LEXIS 277
Summary
Deficiency to be determined in accordance with stipulation.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

decision.

The taxpayer and the Commissioner having agreed that the item of $12,740.03, claimed as a deduction for loss on sale of stocks and bonds in the taxpayer’s 1920 income tax return, should be disallowed to the extent of $1,131.90, the deficiency should be computed accordingly.

Final decision of this Board will be settled on consent or on seven days’ notice by either party.

Combined text as published — syllabus, headnotes and all opinions in one document

Appeal of WILBERT J. AUSTIN.

Austin v. Commissioner

Docket No. 82.

United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 18 ; 1924 BTA LEXIS 277 ; October 18, 1924 , decided Submitted October 15, 1924 .

*277 Deficiency to be determined in accordance with stipulation.

No appearance for the taxpayer.

Robert A. Littleton, Esq. (Nelson T. Hartson, Solicitor of Internal Revenue) for the Commissioner.

*19 Before IVINS, KORNER, and MARQUETTE.

DECISION.

The taxpayer and the Commissioner having agreed that the item of $12,740.03, claimed as a deduction for loss on sale of stocks and bonds in the taxpayer's 1920 income tax return, should be disallowed to the extent of $1,131.90, the deficiency should be computed accordingly.

Final decision of this Board will be settled on consent or on seven days' notice by either party.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Appeal of Austin, 1 B.T.A. 18 (B.T.A. 1924) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list