Scott v. Commissioner
W. M. SCOTT, <emphasis typestyle="it">v.</emphasis> COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
OPINION.
Lansdon:
The petitioners were members of a Texas marital community throughout the year 1926, as to which the respondent has asserted deficiencies against each of them in the amount of $489.29. Such deficiencies arise from the respondent’s determination that an amount of $25,000 received by the petitioners for a ten-year lease of property owned by them to the Magnolia Petroleum Company was taxable income when received. The stipulated facts, which we incorporate by reference as our findings of fact, show that in 1926 the petitioners executed and delivered to the Magnolia Petroleum Company an oil and gas lease covering 5,000 acres of l'and *952 owned by them in fee in consideration of the payment to them of $25,000. The lease provided that such amount was payment not only as a bonus but in lieu of any and all delayed rentals usually provided for in oil and gas leases.
A bonus paid for an oil and gas lease is in effect an addition to the royalties or rentals already determined. It is really royalty or rental in a lump sum or down payment. Work v. Mosier,'281 U. S. 352 . Every bonus paid for an undeveloped oil and gas lease is an advance rental at least to a certain extent. In the instant case the total $25,000 is in the nature of advanced rental, since there is no other rental provided for in the lease. The petitioners contend that it must be spread over the ten-year term of the lease. There is no merit in such contention whether their boobs are kept on a receipts and disbursements basis or on the accrual basis. A bonus received by a lessor of an oil lease is taxable income to the lessor. See Burnet v. Harmel, 287 U. S. 103 , and Murphy Oil Co. v. Burnet, 287 U. S. 299 . When the execution of an oil and gas lease is followed by production of oil, and bonus and royalties are paid to the lessor, both involve at least some return of the capital investment in the oil in the ground, for which a depletion allowance must be made. In the instant case the petitioner makes no claim for depletion and there are no facts in the stipulation which disclose that they are entitled to such deductions. The respondent’s determination must be approved.
Decision vrill be entered for the respondent.
Combined text as published — syllabus, headnotes and all opinions in one document
W. M. SCOTT, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
MRS. W. M. SCOTT, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
Scott v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 44705, 44706.
United States Board of Tax Appeals 27 B.T.A. 951 ; 1933 BTA LEXIS 1277 ; March 16, 1933 , Promulgated *1277 Where upon execution of an oil and gas lease a lump sum is received by the lessor in lieu of bonus and royalties, the amount thereof is income in the year in which it is received.
J. B. Allred, Esq., for the petitioners.
Frank B. Schlosser, Esq., and R. B. Cannon, Esq., for the respondent.
LANSDON *951 OPINION.
LANSDON: The petitioners were members of a Texas marital community throughout the year 1926, as to which the respondent has asserted deficiencies against each of them in the amount of $489.29. Such deficiencies arise from the respondent's determination that an amount of $25,000 received by the petitioners for a ten-year lease of property owned by them to the Magnolia Petroleum Company was taxable income when received. The stipulated facts, which we incorporate by reference as our findings of fact, show that in 1926 the petitioners executed and delivered to the Magnolia Petroleum Company an oil and gas lease covering 5,000 acres of land *952 owned by them in fee in consideration of the payment to them of $25,000. The lease provided that such amount was payment not only as a bonus but in lieu of any and all delayed rentals *1278 usually provided for in oil and gas leases.
A bonus paid for an oil and gas lease is in effect an addition to the royalties or rentals already determined. It is really royalty or rental in a lump sum or down payment. . Every bonus paid for an undeveloped oil and gas lease is an advance rental at least to a certain extent. In the instant case the total $25,000 is in the nature of advanced rental, since there is no other rental provided for in the lease. The petitioners contend that it must be spread over the ten-year term of the lease. There is no merit in such contention whether their books are kept on a receipts and disbursements basis or on the accrual basis. A bonus received by a lessor of an oil lease is taxable income to the lessor. See , and . When the execution of an oil and gas lease is followed by production of oil, and bonus and royalties are paid to the lessor, both involve at least some return of the capital investment in the oil in the ground, for which a depletion allowance must be made. In the instant *1279 case the petitioner makes no claim for depletion and there are no facts in the stipulation which disclose that they are entitled to such deductions. The respondent's determination must be approved.
Decision will be entered for the respondent.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.