TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Robert D. Beard v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Robert D. BEARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee

Beard v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 793 F.2d 139 (6th Cir. 1986)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 24, 1986
Docket
No. 84-1698
Judges
Keith, Nelson, Edwards
Citations
793 F.2d 13958 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 52901986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26374

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Robert Beard appeals a United States Tax Court order and decision granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment and assessing petitioner with additional tax and damages. Petitioner filed a petition in the Tax Court challenging a notice of deficiency issued by the respondent, Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The court concluded that no issues of material fact precluded granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment. The court determined that the wages earned by petitioner are taxable; the altered Treasury Form 1040 filed by petitioner did not constitute a return under 26 U.S.C. § 6011 (1982); and that petitioner therefore owed additional tax for willfully filing a late return in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 6651 (a)(1), 6653(a) (1982).

Upon review of the record, we conclude no genuine issue of material fact precluded the Tax Court from granting summary *140 judgment to respondent. In our view, petitioner’s wages are taxable as gross income, see Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 , 207, 40 S.Ct. 189 , 193, 64 L.Ed. 521 (1920), and petitioner’s altered 1040 form does not constitute a “return” in compliance with 26 U.S.C. § 6011 (a) (1982).

See Counts v. Commissioner, 774 F.2d 426, 427 (11th Cir. 1985) (per curiam).

The decision of the Tax Court is hereby affirmed without sanctions against petitioner, based upon the Tax Court decision reported at 82 T.C. 766 (1984).

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 251 cases

View all citing references →
1986: 101987: 81988: 61989: 51990: 51991: 71992: 31993: 11994: 51995: 41996: 91997: 71998: 21999: 42000: 42001: 72002: 22003: 82004: 62005: 102006: 72007: 42008: 32009: 52010: 82011: 42012: 132013: 172014: 132015: 132016: 92017: 32018: 62019: 72020: 72021: 52022: 32023: 42024: 42025: 22026: 119862026peak 2013 · 17

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mendes v. Comm'r121 T.C. No. 19
  2. Fortunato J. Mendes v. Commissioner121 T.C. No. 19
  3. Rhodes v. United States (In re Rhodes)498 B.R. 357 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2013)
  4. Swanson v. Comm'r121 T.C. No. 7
  5. Sloan v. Commissioner102 T.C. No. 8
  6. Nilsen v. Massachusetts Department of Revenue (In re Nilsen)542 B.R. 640 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2015)

Most recent

  1. Geric Brown v. United States of AmericaNo. 3:25-cv-01890 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 3, 2026)
  2. Jack Donald SupingerNo. 13680-22 (Tax Ct. Sept. 4, 2025)
  3. Marine Wholesale & Warehouse Co.No. 2:22-bk-13785 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. May 27, 2025)
  4. Brian Dean SwansonNo. 10254-22 (Tax Ct. Nov. 12, 2024)
  5. John Salvador v. United StatesNo. 23-60008 (9th Cir. Mar. 1, 2024)
  6. Lagerkvist v. United StatesNo. 1:22-cv-00201 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 29, 2024)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Eisner v. MacOmber, 252 U.S. 189 (1919) 543
Beard v. Comm'r, 82 T.C. No. 60 309
Counts v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 774 F.2d 426 (11th Cir. 1985) 15

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list