TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Susan Poore v. C.F. Air Freight, Inc.

Poore v. C.F. Air Freight, Inc., 798 F.2d 1415 (6th Cir. 1986)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 31, 1986
Docket
No. 85-5511
Citations
798 F.2d 14151986 WL 219148
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

798 F.2d 1415

Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Susan POORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.F. AIR FREIGHT, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 85-5511.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

July 31, 1986.

Before MERRITT and JONES, Circuit Judges, and THOMAS, Senior District Judge. *

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

1

In University of Tennessee v. Eliott, No. 85-588 (Slip op., July 7, 1986) the United States Supreme Court affirmed this Court's holding that "Congress did not intend unreviewed state administrative proceedings to have preclusive effect on Title VII claims," id. at 7. It also held that in Sec. 1983 actions "federal courts must give the agency's factfindings the same preclusive effect to which it would be entitled in the State's Courts," at 10.

2

Accordingly, in this Title VII sex discrimination case the judgment of the District Court holding that a decision of the Administrative Law Judge of the Tennessee Human Rights Commission is entitled to preclusive effect, is error. The judgment is reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's decision in Elliott, supra.

* The Honorable William K. Thomas, Senior District Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list