TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Walter Edward Ruff, Jr. v. William D. Leeke, Commissioner, Scdc and the Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

Ruff v. Leeke, 804 F.2d 1251 (4th Cir. 1986)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 13, 1986
Docket
No. 85-7092
Citations
804 F.2d 12511986 WL 180031986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33581
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

804 F.2d 1251 Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Walter Edward RUFF, Jr., Appellant, v. William D. LEEKE, Commissioner, SCDC; and The Attorney General of The State of South Carolina, Appellees.

No. 85-7092.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 24, 1986. Decided Nov. 13, 1986.

Walter Edward Ruff, Jr., appellant pro se.

T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General, for appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Falcon B. Hawkins, District Judge. (C/A No. 3:84-2258-1J)

Before WIDENER and HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ruff v. Leeke, C/A No. 3:84-2258-1J (D.S.C., Nov. 29, 1985). Ruff's motion for leave to file a supplemental brief is granted.

2

DISMISSED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list