Charlie Benson Bowen v. Ralph Kemp, Warden Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center

Charlie Benson BOWEN, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Ralph KEMP, Warden Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellant

Bowen v. Kemp, 810 F.2d 1007 (11th Cir. 1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided: January 28, 1987
Docket: No. 84-8327
Judges: Roney, Godbold, Tjolat, Hill, Fay, Vance, Kravitch, Johnson, Hatchett, Anderson, Clark, Edmondson
Citations: 810 F.2d 10071987 U.S. App. LEXIS 10651

Cited by 4 Original from court

Opinion

ON SUA SPONTE RECONSIDERATION BY THE COURT:

On the Court’s own motion, a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of rehearing this appeal en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the mandate issued on July 11, 1986, is RECALLED and that this case shall be heard by this court *1008 sitting en banc, with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.

The previous panel’s opinion and the order entered on December 2, 1985, denying rehearing and rehearing en banc are VACATED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →

U.S. Courts of Appeals4

Relies on it most ⓘ

Hudgins v. City of Ashburn890 F.2d 396 (11th Cir. 1989)
Bowen v. Kemp832 F.2d 546 (11th Cir. 1987)
Hudgins v. City Of Ashburn890 F.2d 396 (11th Cir. 1990)
Charlie Benson Bowen v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center - Horace William Dix v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia State Prison832 F.2d 546 (11th Cir. 1987)

Most recent

Hudgins v. City Of Ashburn890 F.2d 396 (11th Cir. 1990)
Hudgins v. City of Ashburn890 F.2d 396 (11th Cir. 1989)
Charlie Benson Bowen v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center - Horace William Dix v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia State Prison832 F.2d 546 (11th Cir. 1987)
Bowen v. Kemp832 F.2d 546 (11th Cir. 1987)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list