TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Larry McKay v. Michael Dutton, Amos L. Wilson, Cobb, Georgekeely, John Downtown, and Sonny Wiese

McKay v. Dutton, 815 F.2d 704 (6th Cir. 1987)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 16, 1987
Docket
No. 86-6282
Citations
815 F.2d 7041987 WL 367951987 U.S. App. LEXIS 18188
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

815 F.2d 704

Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Larry McKAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael DUTTON, Amos L. Wilson, Cobb, GeorgeKeely, John Downtown, and Sonny Wiese, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-6282.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 16, 1987.

Before ENGEL, KRUPANSKY and GUY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER 1

Appellant has responded to this Court's order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed.

2

On September 25, 1986, the district court entered an order dismissing appellant's civil rights action. On October 11, 1986, appellant served a motion for rehearing properly construed as a motion under Rule 59(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Huff v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 675 F.2d 119 (6th Cir.1982). The motion did not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal because it was not served within 10 days of entry of judgment. Rule 59(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Rule 4(a)(4), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Myers v. Ace Hardware, 777 F.2d 1099 (6th Cir.1985). The notice of appeal, filed December 9, 1986, is 43 days late.

3

In the response to show cause order, appellant argues that Rule 6(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, allows three days to be added to a prescribed period when a party is required to act or take action with a prescribed period of time after the service of a paper and the paper is served by mail. Rule 6(e) is inapplicable to the case herein. The three day extension applies only when a party is required to act within a prescribed period of time after service of a paper on that party and the paper is served by mail. The 10 day period in which to serve a time-tolling motion is contingent upon the date of entry of judgment, not the date of service. Rule 4(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Myers, supra.

4

Compliance with Rule 4(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this Court can neither extend nor waive. Peake v. First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 717 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir.1983). This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was untimely filed. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1999: 119992026peak 1999 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Myers v. Ace Hardware, Inc., 777 F.2d 1099 (6th Cir. 1985) 236
Peake v. The First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Marquette, 717 F.2d 1016 (1st Cir. 1983) 585
Huff v. Metro. Life Ins. Co. & Elizabeth Huff, 675 F.2d 119 (6th Cir. 1982) 225
Mariona v. Hodari, 815 F.2d 704 (6th Cir. 1987) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list