TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States Fire Insurance Company v. Denise Ganz

United States Fire Insurance Company, and United Pacific Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. Denise Ganz, Michael Ganz, Enviroscope Corp., Lars De Jounge, B. Jack Elkin, Elkam Air Services, and Neptune Society Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant

United States Fire Ins. Co. v. Ganz, 818 F.2d 712 (9th Cir. 1987)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 5, 1987
Docket
No. 86-1522
Citations
818 F.2d 7121987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7203

Opinion

818 F.2d 712

UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, and United Pacific Insurance Company, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, v. Denise GANZ, Michael Ganz, Enviroscope Corp., Lars De Jounge, B. Jack Elkin, Elkam Air Services, Defendant, and Neptune Society Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant.

No. 86-1522.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 11, 1987. Decided June 5, 1987.

Daniel W. Winters, Burlingame, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

James J. Keenan, Jr., Lafayette, Cal., for defendant-intervenor-appellant.

James P. Wagoner, Fresno, Cal., for plaintiff-intervenor-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Samuel Conti, District Judge, Presiding.

Before SKOPIL, FARRIS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.ORDER 1

Neptune Society Corporation appeals from the district court's grant of separate summary judgments in favor of appellee United States Fire Insurance Company and appellee United Pacific Insurance Company. United States Fire Insurance v. Ganz, 623 F.Supp. 337 (N.D.Cal.1985).

2

At oral argument appellant moved this court for dismissal of its appeal of the judgment in favor of appellee United Pacific Insurance Company. Appellant's motion is granted and the appeal of the judgment in favor of United Pacific Insurance Company is DISMISSED.

3

The judgment in favor of United States Fire Insurance Company is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. Id. at 341-42 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States Fire Ins. v. Ganz, 623 F. Supp. 337 (N.D. Cal. 1985) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list