TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

A.M. JATOI, MD v. HURST-EULESS-BEDFORD HOSPITAL AUTHORITY

50 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1728, 44 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,362 A.M. Jatoi, Md v. Hurst-Euless-Bedford Hospital Authority

A.M. Jatoi, MD v. Hurst-Euless-Bedford Hosp. Auth., 819 F.2d 545 (5th Cir. 1987)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 18, 1987
Docket
No. 85-1745
Judges
Clark, Per Curiam, Reavley, Williams
Citations
819 F.2d 54550 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 17281987 U.S. App. LEXIS 867844 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,362

Opinion — Per Curiam

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion January 14, 5th Cir.1987, 807 F.2d 1214 )

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, REAVLEY, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On Petition for Rehearing the panel modifies its opinion to include the test for racial discrimination in § 1981 cases announced by the Supreme Court in Saint Francis College, et al. v. Al-Khazraji, — U.S. -, -, 107 S.Ct. 2022, 2026 , 95 L.Ed.2d 582 (1987). In St. Francis the Supreme Court explained that “a distinctive physiognomy is not essential to qualify for § 1981 protection.” This test modifies the statement in our original opinion that a plaintiff must allege he suffered discrimination based on his membership in a group that is ethnically and physiognomically distinct. 807 F.2d at 1218 .

On remand defendant Methodist Affiliated Hospitals will have the opportunity to seek dismissal of the case against it based on the assertion it made to this Court that no evidence has connected it to Dr. Jatoi’s claims..

No member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on this Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35) the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 24 cases

View all citing references →
1989: 31993: 31995: 31996: 31997: 41998: 12001: 22002: 12006: 419892026peak 1997 · 4

Most recent

  1. Chellen v. John Pickle Co., Inc.446 F. Supp. 2d 1247 (N.D. Okla. 2006)
  2. Ahmmad Pourghoraishi v. Flying J, Incorporated, Steve Lindgren, Larry Williams, City of Gary, Indiana, Nakon Security, Incorporated449 F.3d 751 (7th Cir. 2006)
  3. Chellen v. John Pickle Co., Inc.434 F. Supp. 2d 1069 (N.D. Okla. 2006)
  4. Pourghoraishi, Ahmma v. Flying J IncNo. 05-1107 (7th Cir. Apr. 20, 2006)
  5. Peguese v. BorupNo. 01-40716 (5th Cir. Mar. 1, 2002)
  6. Peguese v. J.R. Borup144 F. Supp. 2d 743 (S.D. Tex. 2001)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Saint Francis Coll. v. Al-Khazraji, 481 U.S. 604 (1987) 830
A.M. Jatoi, Md v. Hurst-Euless-Bedford Hosp. Auth., 807 F.2d 1214 (5th Cir. 1987) 49

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list