Hall v. Quarterman
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 15, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-70041
MICHAEL WAYNE HALL, Petitioner-Appellant versus
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth (06-CV-436)
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
We grant a certificate of appealability on Michael Wayne
Hall’s Atkins claim.1 The case will be scheduled for oral argument
before this panel.
We are not presently persuaded to grant and we defer decision
upon the application for a certificate of appealability on Hall’s
Ring2 and Penry3 claims until after oral argument. The Court does 1 Atkins v. Virginia , 506 U.S. 314 (2002); Hall v. Texas, 537 U.S. 802 (2002). 2 Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002). 3 Penry v. Johnson, 532 U.S. 782 (2001). not request but the parties may supplement the Ring and Penry
claims and offer argument, if they wish to do so.
So ORDERED.
2
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.