TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Pippin v. Quarterman

Roy Lee PIPPIN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Nathaniel QUARTERMAN; John Doe, Warden, TDCJ-ID, Walls Unit; John Doe, Executioner, TDCJ-ID, Walls Unit; Rick Perry, Governor, State of Texas, Defendants-Appellees

Pippin v. Quarterman, 223 F. App'x 433 (5th Cir. 2007)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 28, 2007
Docket
No. 07-70007
Judges
King, Higginbotham, Prado
Citations
223 F. App'x 433
Status
Unpublished

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

* Plaintiff-appellant Roy Lee Pippin is scheduled to be executed by the State of Texas on March 29, 2007.

Pippin was convicted of murdering more than one person during the same criminal transaction and murdering one of the victims during the course of a kidnapping. Pippin was sentenced to death. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed his conviction and sentence.

Pippin v. State, No. 72,252 (Tex.Crim.App. May 21, 1997). Pippin unsuccessfully petitioned for state and federal habeas corpus relief.

See generally Pippin v. Dretke, 434 F.3d 782 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 351 , 166 L.Ed.2d 49 (2006).

Pippin, acting pro se, filed an action in district court on March 23, 2007, challenging the combination of drugs used by the State of Texas to administer lethal injections. Pippin asserted that the drugs may paralyze but not produce unconsciousness, constituting cruel and unusual punishment. The district court dismissed Pippin’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, holding that Pippin was dilatory in raising his challenge to the drug combination used.

Pippin v. Quarterman, No. H007-0982, 2007 WL 950397 (S.D.Tex. Mar. 26, 2007). We affirm the district court’s final judgment entered March 26, 2007, for essentially the reasons given in its Memorandum and Order.

See Harris v. Johnson, 376 F.3d 414 (5th Cir.2004).

AFFIRMED. Pippin’s motion for a stay of execution is DENIED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2008: 120082026peak 2008 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bishop v. Epps287 F. App'x 371 (5th Cir. 2008)

Most recent

  1. Bishop v. Epps287 F. App'x 371 (5th Cir. 2008)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Pippin v. Doug Dretke, Dir., Tex. Dep't of Criminal Justice, Corr. Institutions Div., 434 F.3d 782 (5th Cir. 2005) 110
Harris v. Johnson, 376 F.3d 414 (5th Cir. 2004) 53

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list