TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

L.A. Draper & Son, Inc. v. Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc.

L.A. Draper & Son, Inc. v. Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc., a Corporation Hessco Industrial Supply, Inc., a Corporation Fred Z. Hester, an Individual, Joseph E. O'callaghan, an Individual

L.A. Draper & Son, Inc. v. Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc., 821 F.2d 590 (11th Cir. 1987)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 15, 1987
Docket
No. 85-7658
Citations
821 F.2d 590

Opinion

821 F.2d 590

L.A. DRAPER & SON, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WHEELABRATOR-FRYE, INC., a corporation; Hessco Industrial Supply, Inc., a corporation; Fred Z. Hester, an individual, Joseph E. O'Callaghan, an individual, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 85-7658.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 15, 1987.

Thad G. Long, Bradley, Arant, Rose & White, Jere F. White, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-appellant.

L. Vastine Stabler, Jr., Cabaniss, Johnston, Gardner, Dumas & O'Neal, Birmingham, Ala., L. Murray Alley, for Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc. & Hessco.

Ralph D. Gaines, Jr., Gaines & Cleckler, P.C., Talledega, Ala., Charlie P. Gaines, for Hester.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama; Guin, District Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion March 27, 1987, 11 Cir., 813 F.2d 332 )

Before HILL and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges and THOMAS * , Senior District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

On petition for rehearing the appellant, L.A. Draper & Sons, Inc., moves this court to clarify its disposition of the case with respect to defendant Hessco Industrial Supply, Inc., a corporation. After closely examining the record we have determined that neither the district court nor this court ever treated the claims against Hessco as separate from the claims against Hessco's founder, Fred Z. Hester. Thus, no determination has been made regarding the degree to which Hessco's potential liabilities and defenses may be differentiated from Hesters. Such a determination must be made in the first instance in district court. Accordingly, we clarify our earlier opinion by vacating the district court's judgment in favor of Hessco and remanding the claims against Hessco to the district court for further proceedings, not inconsistent with the panel opinion in this case, 813 F.2d 332 (11th Cir.1987).

2

In all other respects the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

* Honorable Daniel H. Thomas, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Alabama, sitting by designation

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list