TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wilton Chatman-Bey v. William French Smith

Wilton CHATMAN-BEY v. William French SMITH, Et Al.

Wilton Chatman-Bey v. Smith, 821 F.2d 789 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 26, 1987
Docket
No. 84-5901
Judges
Wald, Robinson, Mikva, Edwards, Ginsburg, Bork, Starr, Silberman, Buckley, Williams
Citations
821 F.2d 789261 U.S. App. D.C. 301

Opinion — Per Curiam

ORDER PER CURIAM.

It is ORDERED, by the Court en banc, on its own motion, that the judgment and opinion of the Court filed on August 5, 1986, 797 F.2d 987 , be, and the same hereby are, vacated. And it is FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, on its own motion, that the Court en banc will hear oral argument in the captioned case on October 7,1987 at 10:00 a.m. Argument will be limited to the following issue:

Did the United States District Court for the District of Columbia properly exercise jurisdiction over appellant’s claim that his parole eligibility date was improperly calculated?

It is FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, on its own motion, that each side shall be allocated 20 minutes for its oral presentation. The Court anticipates requesting no further briefing by the parties, having obtained the arguments of both sides in the Supplemental Brief for Appellees and at pages 35-59 of the Supplemental Brief for Appellant, pages 2-12 of Appellees’ Response to Supplemental Brief for Appellant, and pages 1-12 of the Supplemental Reply Brief for Appellant. If the parties wish to present additional briefing on the issue of jurisdiction, they should so advise the Court by motion filed no later than July 1, 1987, and jointly state a proposed page limitation for whatever additional briefing the Court may authorize.

It is FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the parties shall furnish the Court on or before August 14, 1987, with 30 additional copies of all previously filed briefs, or portions thereof, addressed to the question of jurisdiction.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Wilton Chatman-Bey v. Meese, 797 F.2d 987 (D.C. Cir. 1986) 18

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list