Stoddard v. Seattle National Bank
Helen G. Stoddard v. Seattle National Bank
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Dunbar, J.
This is an equitable action and no exceptions were taken to the findings of fact or conclusions of law made by the trial judge. Under the laws of 1893, and in accordance with the decision of this court in Washington Brick, Lime & Mfg. Co. v. Adler, ante, p. 24, and further, in accordance with the uniform holdings of this court, the evidence upon which the findings of fact were based cannot be reviewed here. The result will be that the statement of facts must be stricken from the record; and, as it is conceded that no questions of law arise upon the pleadings in this case, the appeal will be dismissed and the judgment of the lower court affirmed.
Hoyt, 0. J., and Scott and Gordon, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.