Coles v. McNamara
Harrison Coles v. Thomas F. McNamara, as Deputy Sheriff of King County
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
This is an appeal from an order quashing two writs of garnishment sued out by appellant, one against King county to garnish the salary of respondent Starwich, and the other against King county to garnish the salary of respondent McNamara.
The appeal is brought here on the transcript of the record and the bill of exceptions.
The affidavits of the two defendants show that, at the time of the issuance of the garnishments in each case, each defendant was married; the sum garnished was the monthly wages of such defendants, and such wages were the community property of the defendant and his wife; that the judgment against each defendant was a separate judgment, and the community not liable for the same.
Under §§ 6890, 6891 and 6892, Rem. Comp. Stat. [P. C. § 1432 et seq.], wages are community property of the husband and wife.
*692 The damages complained of in the action by appellant were for personal torts for which the community is not liable. Brotton v. Langert, 1 Wash. 73 , 23 Pac. 688 ; Bice v. Brown, 98 Wash: 416, 167 Pac. 1097 ; Kies v. Wilkinson, 114 Wash. 89 , 194 Pac. 582 , 12 A. L. R. 833.
The order quashing the writs of garnishment was therefore proper and there is no valid reason for reversing the adjudication.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.