Van Dusen v. Kelleher
W. A. Van Dusen v. Daniel Kelleher
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
At the hearing of this cause a motion was made by respondents to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. The judgment appealed from was rendered on the 4th of May, 1898. Notice of appeal was served on May 18, 1898, but not filed until June 1, 1898. The appeal bond was served on May 18, 1898, and filed June 1, 1898. Section 4 of the appeal act of 1893 (Session Laws, p. 121, Bal. Code, § 6503), requires the notice of appeal to be filed within five days after service. Section 6 of the same act (Laws 1893, p. 122, Bal. Code, § 6505) provides that an appeal shall not become effectual for any purpose, unless the appeal bond be filed with the clerk of the court within five days after the notice of appeal is given or served. These requirements have been held to be jurisdictional. Hibbard v. Delanty, ante, p. 539.
The motion must prevail and the appeal is dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.