Schlotfeldt v. Bull
J. J. Schlotfeldt v. Walter A. Bull
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
This was a suit to foreclose a mortgage executed by Walter A. Bull and wife to secure a promissory note executed by the husband in 1884. The issue *363 seems to have been the plea of the statute of limitations. The superior court found that payments had been made upon the note at sufficient intervals to prevent the bar of the statute. At the hearing of the cause counsel for respondents appeared, — counsel for the appellants not appearing,- — and moved for an affirmance of the judgment. An inspection of the record discloses that no statement of facts was filed; and the errors assigned, consisting of exceptions to the findings of fact, cannot he considered upon the record here. The judgment must therefore he affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.