State ex rel. Taylor v. Cummings
State of Washington on the Relation of Charles L. Taylor v. Martin Cummings
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
This is a contest between the relator and respondent over an election, involving the' right to the office of road supervisor in road district No. 19 of King county, state of Washington, for the term of one year, to commence on the first Tuesday of January, 1901. Inasmuch as the term of office has expired, and there is no subject matter upon which the judgment of this court can operate, this cause will be dismissed under the rule announced in State ex rel. Daniels v. Prosser, 16 Wash. 608 *317 ( 48 Pac. 262 ) ; State ex rel. Coiner v. Wickersham, 16 Wash. 161 ( 47 Pac. 421 ) ; and Hice v. Orr, 16 Wash. 163 ( 47 Pac. 424 ).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 11 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.