Metler v. Metler
Charles K. Metler v. Mattie E. Metler
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
— The appeal in this case is from an order vacating a judgment, and motion is made by the respondent to dismiss the appeal for the reason that such order is not an appealable order. Under the rule announced in Freeman v. Ambrose, 12 Wash. 1 ( 40 Pac. 381 ), and Nelson v. Denny, 26 Wash. 327 ( 67 Pac. 78 ), the motion must be sustained and the appeal dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.