State v. Littooy
State of Washington v. H. C. Littooy
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
Appellant was prosecuted upon an information charging him with “the crime of owning, running and managing a dental office or department in the state of Washington, without a license.” From a judgment of conviction in the superior court, he appeals to this court.
The facts in this case are similar to those involved in the case of State v. Brown (No. 5396), ante p. 97, 79, Pac. 635, just decided and are controlled by the same legal considerations. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment of the honorable superior court in this case is reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions to dismiss the action.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.