McNeilly v. McNeilly
Andrew McNeilly, Administrator of the Estate of Mary McNeilly v. Hugh McNeilly
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curdim.
This was an equitable action for an accounting. The plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment. The statement of fac-ts was stricken by this court, on the 10th day of June, 1904; so that only two of the errors assigned can be considered on the record before us. These are, (1) error in overruling the demurrer to the affirmative defense set forth in the answer, and (2) error in overruling a motion for judgment in favor of plaintiff, for failure on the part of the defendant to answer certain interrogatories propounded to him. The findings of the court fully sustain the judgment, regardless of the affirmative defense, so that, conceding that the ruling on the demurrer was erroneous, it was error without prejudice. The record discloses no such ruling as is referred to in the second assignment.
There is no error in the record and the judgment must be affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.